EVLU vs. DGRO
EVLU (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVLU is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EVLU returned 72.04% vs 22.54% for DGRO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVLU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
EVLU vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.
EVLU
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 15.31%
- YTD
- 34.01%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- 72.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
EVLU vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF | 34.01% | 38.54% | 1.61% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVLU and DGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVLU vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
EVLU
DGRO
EVLU vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVLU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.80 | 2.39 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.71 | 3.49 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.43 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | 3.50 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.79 | 13.52 | +7.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVLU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80 | 2.39 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | 0.76 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
EVLU vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVLU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -35.10% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -6.47% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -0.28% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.44% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.67% | +1.81% |
Volatility
EVLU vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVLU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 2.21% | +6.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 6.91% | +9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 9.48% | +9.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 13.82% | +6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 16.62% | +3.31% |
EVLU vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVLU vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF | 3.88% | 5.20% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVLU and DGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVLU has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 72.04% vs 22.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 72.04% return vs 22.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.
EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
EVLU is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.08% for DGRO.
EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVLU and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer