EVLN vs. SPTS
EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) and SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while SPTS is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. EVLN is actively managed, while SPTS is passively managed. Over the past year, EVLN returned 4.86% vs 3.45% for SPTS. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. EVLN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTS.
Performance
EVLN vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPTS's 0.45% return.
EVLN
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
EVLN vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 1.37% | 5.59% | 7.29% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 0.45% | 5.05% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVLN and SPTS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVLN vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank
EVLN
SPTS
EVLN vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVLN | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.55 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.13 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 16.52 | -7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVLN | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.49 | +2.06 |
Drawdowns
EVLN vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and SPTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVLN | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -5.83% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.77% | -0.84% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.28% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -1.72% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.21% | +0.33% |
Volatility
EVLN vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.34%. This indicates that EVLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVLN | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.34% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 0.86% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89% | 1.32% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 1.98% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 1.72% | +0.71% |
EVLN vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVLN vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison
EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than SPTS's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 6.92% | 7.28% | 6.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.99% | 4.25% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVLN and SPTS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVLN has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLN dropped -2.78% vs SPTS's -5.83%.
On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.86% vs 3.45% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.
EVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while SPTS is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EVLN and 0.03% for SPTS.
SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVLN and SPTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer