PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVGRX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVGRX achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EVGRX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


EVGRX

1D
0.46%
1M
5.09%
YTD
12.54%
6M
13.23%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
9.63%

TSAIX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.96%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.38%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund
12.54%17.21%9.46%13.75%-15.04%8.67%19.99%22.25%-9.56%18.69%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.64%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EVGRX and TSAIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2016

0.95

The correlation between EVGRX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVGRX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVGRX
EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVGRXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.65

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

11.60

+2.03

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVGRX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVGRXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.11

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.72

0.00

Drawdowns

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVGRX drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVGRX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVGRXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-34.58%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-10.28%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-17.29%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-28.28%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.15%

-34.58%

+3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-4.92%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.34%

-0.34%

Volatility

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVGRXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.72%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

10.26%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

12.92%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

16.25%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.45%

17.65%

-4.20%

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVGRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVGRX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

EVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.95%, more than TSAIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund
16.95%19.08%0.13%1.88%1.48%20.40%5.41%1.08%10.83%9.95%0.47%0.00%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.67%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EVGRX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EVGRX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to TSAIX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVGRX dropped -31.15% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

EVGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVGRX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer