PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EVGRX vs. EVFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EVGRX vs. EVFCX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX).

EVGRX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. EVFCX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012.

Performance

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund		-0.78%17.21%9.46%13.75%-15.04%8.67%19.99%22.25%-9.56%18.69%
EVFCX
E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund		-0.48%10.49%3.43%6.73%-9.65%1.78%10.84%12.57%-4.42%9.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVGRX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than EVFCX's -0.48% return.

EVGRX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
1.23%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
—

EVFCX

1D
1.28%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
0.37%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund

E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund

Often compared with EVGRX:
EVGRX vs. EVFTXEVGRX vs. EVFGXEVGRX vs. EVFMXEVGRX vs. EVVCXEVGRX vs. SCLAXEVGRX vs. STDAXEVGRX vs. CSTAX
Often compared with EVFCX:
EVFCX vs. EVFMXEVFCX vs. EVFGXEVFCX vs. EVFTXEVFCX vs. EVVCXEVFCX vs. BERIXEVFCX vs. AAAAXEVFCX vs. CONWX

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVGRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than EVFCX's 1.07% expense ratio.

EVFCX
E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund

Return for Risk

EVGRX vs. EVFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EVGRX
EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
EVFCX
EVFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EVFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EVGRXEVFCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.05

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.12

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.03

8.31

-0.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the EVFCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVGRX and EVFCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EVGRXEVFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.63

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between EVGRX and EVFCX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Dividend Comparison

EVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.23%, more than EVFCX's 2.84% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVGRX
E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund		19.23%19.08%0.13%1.88%1.48%20.40%5.41%1.08%10.83%9.95%0.47%
EVFCX
E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund		2.84%2.83%1.81%3.66%2.06%12.38%1.68%2.17%6.26%4.47%0.76%

Drawdowns

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVGRX drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, which is greater than EVFCX's maximum drawdown of -19.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVGRX and EVFCX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EVGRXEVFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-19.11%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-4.54%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-13.38%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-3.30%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-3.61%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.16%

+1.17%

Volatility

EVGRX vs. EVFCX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) at 3.04%. This indicates that EVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EVGRXEVFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

3.04%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

4.36%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

6.59%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

5.60%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

6.55%

+6.88%