EVGRX vs. FCSRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVGRX (E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, EVGRX returned 9.63%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for FCSRX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVGRX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.

Performance

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVGRX achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than FCSRX's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EVGRX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.69% annualized return.

EVGRX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

FCSRX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 5.29%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	12.54%	17.21%	9.46%	13.75%	-15.04%	8.67%	19.99%	22.25%	-9.56%	18.69%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	8.28%	9.27%	4.75%	3.60%	-4.26%	14.68%	2.60%	9.54%	-5.03%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EVGRX and FCSRX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2016	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EVGRX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EVGRX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVGRX

EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 63
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FCSRX

FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVGRX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	3.39	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	4.78	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.68	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	7.81	-4.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	29.53	-15.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVGRX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVGRX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	3.39	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.77	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.70	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.45	+0.28

Drawdowns

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVGRX drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVGRX and FCSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVGRX	FCSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-33.91%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-1.99%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.27%	-5.85%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.72%	-13.22%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.15%	-20.02%	-11.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.74%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-5.09%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	0.52%	+1.48%

Volatility

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.23%. This indicates that EVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVGRX	FCSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	1.23%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	3.58%	+6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.72%	4.59%	+7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.61%	6.89%	+5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.45%	6.71%	+6.74%

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVGRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVGRX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

EVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.95%, more than FCSRX's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	16.95%	19.08%	0.13%	1.88%	1.48%	20.40%	5.41%	1.08%	10.83%	9.95%	0.47%	0.00%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	3.27%	3.74%	3.86%	4.35%	6.51%	4.53%	1.32%	2.20%	8.51%	1.58%	1.34%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVGRX and FCSRX in my portfolio?

EVGRX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVGRX or FCSRX?

EVGRX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to FCSRX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVGRX dropped -31.15% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.