EVGRX vs. FRGAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX).

EVGRX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. FRGAX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 1, 2022.

Performance

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	-3.46%	17.21%	9.46%	13.75%	-1.60%
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	-3.53%	17.10%	12.91%	17.57%	-1.63%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EVGRX having a -3.46% return and FRGAX slightly lower at -3.53%.

EVGRX

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -8.30%
• YTD: -3.46%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 10.85%
• 5Y*: 4.99%
• 10Y*: —

FRGAX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: -3.53%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 13.49%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVGRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

EVGRX

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund

FRGAX

Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

EVGRX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVGRX

EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 60
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FRGAX

FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVGRX	FRGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.15	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.67	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	1.41	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	6.55	-0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVGRX and FRGAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVGRX	FRGAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.15	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	1.21	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between EVGRX and FRGAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

EVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.76%, more than FRGAX's 2.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	19.76%	19.08%	0.13%	1.88%	1.48%	20.40%	5.41%	1.08%	10.83%	9.95%	0.47%
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.77%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVGRX drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVGRX and FRGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVGRX	FRGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-11.77%	-19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-8.53%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.75%	-7.03%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-1.62%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.87%	+0.43%

Volatility

EVGRX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 3.78%. This indicates that EVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVGRX	FRGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	3.78%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	6.72%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.38%	11.92%	+2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.44%	10.27%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.41%	10.27%	+3.14%