EVGRX vs. DGIFX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EVGRX (E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund) and DGIFX (Disciplined Growth Investors Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, EVGRX returned 9.12%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for DGIFX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EVGRX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DGIFX.

Performance

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVGRX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EVGRX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 9.12%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.

EVGRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.25%
• 6M: 5.91%
• YTD: 9.85%
• 1Y: 19.64%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 6.85%
• 10Y*: 9.12%
• ALL TIME*: 9.27%

DGIFX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 0.85%
• 6M: 10.78%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 1Y: 18.01%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 12.00%
• ALL TIME*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	9.85%	17.21%	9.46%	13.75%	-15.04%	8.67%	19.99%	22.25%	-9.56%	18.69%
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	15.68%	3.54%	21.13%	33.10%	-18.35%	9.59%	24.07%	23.97%	-2.39%	14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EVGRX and DGIFX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2016	0.85

The correlation between EVGRX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVGRX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVGRX

EVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 50
EVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
EVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
EVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

DGIFX

DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 28
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVGRX	DGIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.01	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.49	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.18	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.50	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	4.40	+4.22

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVGRX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVGRX drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVGRX and DGIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVGRX	DGIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-30.93%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-10.91%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.27%	-30.93%	+14.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.72%	-30.93%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.15%	-30.93%	-0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.50%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.70%	-5.87%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.72%	-1.58%

Volatility

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund (EVGRX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) have volatilities of 3.85% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVGRX	DGIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	3.71%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	12.11%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	16.26%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	21.22%	-8.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.50%	18.70%	-5.20%

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVGRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVGRX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

EVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, more than DGIFX's 7.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	7.15%	8.29%	20.95%	2.78%	2.21%	11.12%	10.09%	3.53%	3.74%	4.29%	0.00%
EVGRX E-Valuator Growth (70%-85%) RMS Fund	17.80%	19.08%	0.13%	1.88%	1.48%	20.40%	5.41%	1.08%	10.83%	9.95%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVGRX and DGIFX in my portfolio?

EVGRX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVGRX or DGIFX?

EVGRX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to DGIFX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVGRX dropped -31.15% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.