PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVFTX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFTX achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than CONWX's 6.98% return.


EVFTX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.45%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.49%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
6.98%
6M
6.89%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVFTX
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund
8.38%12.51%6.21%8.70%-11.39%4.13%12.91%16.84%-8.93%11.51%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
6.98%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFTX and CONWX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between EVFTX and CONWX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVFTX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFTX
EVFTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EVFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVFTXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.38

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

3.49

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.50

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.47

13.12

+0.35

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFTX and CONWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVFTXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.64

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.76

-0.07

Drawdowns

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFTX drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFTX and CONWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFTXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.47%

-26.09%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-3.68%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-9.86%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.06%

-12.49%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.11%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-2.78%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.26%

+0.09%

Volatility

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 1.42%. This indicates that EVFTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVFTXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.42%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

5.13%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

6.96%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

10.19%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

11.10%

-2.28%

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVFTX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

EVFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than CONWX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.45%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%
EVFTX
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund
4.24%4.60%1.06%2.83%1.66%12.53%0.71%1.14%6.85%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVFTX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVFTX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to CONWX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFTX dropped -24.47% vs CONWX's -26.09%.

CONWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVFTX and CONWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer