PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVER vs. AFRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EVER vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVER achieves a -26.00% return, which is significantly lower than AFRM's -11.10% return.


EVER

1D
0.71%
1M
5.94%
YTD
-26.00%
6M
-27.97%
1Y
-22.38%
3Y*
34.62%
5Y*
-10.03%
10Y*

AFRM

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.16%
YTD
-11.10%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
52.28%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVER vs. AFRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EVER
EverQuote, Inc.
-26.00%35.07%63.32%-16.96%-5.87%-59.71%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
-11.10%22.22%23.93%408.17%-90.38%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EVER and AFRM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EVER:

$738.10M

AFRM:

$23.03B

EPS

EVER:

$2.92

AFRM:

$1.10

PE Ratio

EVER:

6.83

AFRM:

60.05

PS Ratio

EVER:

1.05

AFRM:

7.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

EVER:

$716.74M

AFRM:

$3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EVER:

$698.48M

AFRM:

$2.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

EVER:

$78.59M

AFRM:

$908.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVER vs. AFRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVER
EVER Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EVER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVER Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVER Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EVER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVER Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRM
AFRM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AFRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFRM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVER vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVERAFRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.07

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.16

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.31

-1.20

EVER vs. AFRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVER Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVER and AFRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVER vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVER drawdown since its inception was -91.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVER and AFRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVERAFRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.18%

-94.71%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.80%

-53.86%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.97%

-55.85%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.02%

-94.71%

+10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.18%

-60.73%

-7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.36%

-68.65%

+10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.34%

27.04%

-1.70%

Volatility

EVER vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) is 15.17%, while Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a volatility of 17.80%. This indicates that EVER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVERAFRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.17%

17.80%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.83%

43.83%

+20.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.92%

60.85%

+19.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.71%

96.23%

-23.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.93%

95.46%

-19.53%

Dividends

EVER vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVER nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EVER vs. AFRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EverQuote, Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
190.85M
268.03M
(EVER) Total Revenue
(AFRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EVER vs. AFRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EverQuote, Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
97.8%
0
Portfolio components
EVER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 186.59M and revenue of 190.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.

AFRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EVER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.42M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

AFRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

EVER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

AFRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EVER and AFRM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFRM has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to EVER (15.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVER dropped -91.18% vs AFRM's -94.71%.

AFRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVER and AFRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer