EVER vs. AEM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).

Performance

EVER vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EVER vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EVER EverQuote, Inc.	-45.41%	35.07%	63.32%	-16.96%	-5.87%	-58.07%	8.73%	721.77%	-76.80%
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	24.14%	119.53%	46.04%	8.98%	1.08%	-22.81%	17.39%	54.18%	-8.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EVER : $556.48M AEM : $105.61B
EPS EVER : $2.63 AEM : $8.83
PE Ratio EVER : 5.62 AEM : 23.79
PEG Ratio EVER : 0.03 AEM : 0.37
PS Ratio EVER : 0.81 AEM : 8.91
Total Revenue (TTM) EVER : $692.52M AEM : $11.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) EVER : $673.15M AEM : $6.80B
EBITDA (TTM) EVER : $58.34M AEM : $8.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVER achieves a -45.41% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 24.14% return.

EVER

• 1D: -4.41%
• 1M: -7.76%
• YTD: -45.41%
• 6M: -33.51%
• 1Y: -44.50%
• 3Y*: 1.98%
• 5Y*: -17.48%
• 10Y*: —

AEM

• 1D: 3.50%
• 1M: -16.70%
• YTD: 24.14%
• 6M: 23.94%
• 1Y: 96.09%
• 3Y*: 63.68%
• 5Y*: 31.78%
• 10Y*: 21.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EVER vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVER

EVER Risk / Return Rank: 6
EVER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
EVER Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EVER Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EVER Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EVER Martin Ratio Rank: 1

AEM

AEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVER vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVER	AEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	2.19	-3.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	2.45	-3.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.35	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	3.31	-4.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.11	11.38	-13.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVER vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVER Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVER and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVER	AEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	2.19	-3.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	0.88	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.18	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between EVER and AEM is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EVER vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

EVER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVER EverQuote, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	0.79%	0.94%	2.05%	2.92%	3.08%	2.63%	2.36%	0.89%	1.09%	0.89%	0.86%	1.22%

Drawdowns

EVER vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVER drawdown since its inception was -91.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVER and AEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVER	AEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.18%	-90.49%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.80%	-28.97%	-19.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.62%	-46.76%	-38.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.52%	-16.70%	-59.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.28%	-46.76%	-10.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.71%	8.42%	+12.29%

Volatility

EVER vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) is 12.72%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 15.66%. This indicates that EVER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVER	AEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.72%	15.66%	-2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.04%	35.75%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.48%	44.10%	+5.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.58%	36.39%	+30.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.74%	37.46%	+35.28%

Financials

EVER vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EverQuote, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EVER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 190.88M and revenue of 195.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.7%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 3.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

EVER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.63M and revenue of 195.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.99B and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.9%.

EVER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 57.76M and revenue of 195.32M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.52B and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.