PortfoliosLab logo
EVER vs. AEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EVER and AEM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EVER vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EVER:

-0.08

AEM:

2.24

Sortino Ratio

EVER:

0.37

AEM:

2.61

Omega Ratio

EVER:

1.04

AEM:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

EVER:

-0.09

AEM:

4.24

Martin Ratio

EVER:

-0.29

AEM:

14.30

Ulcer Index

EVER:

21.76%

AEM:

5.26%

Daily Std Dev

EVER:

67.41%

AEM:

34.34%

Max Drawdown

EVER:

-91.18%

AEM:

-90.33%

Current Drawdown

EVER:

-63.29%

AEM:

-4.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EVER:

$841.00M

AEM:

$59.50B

EPS

EVER:

$1.03

AEM:

$4.70

PE Ratio

EVER:

22.45

AEM:

25.14

PEG Ratio

EVER:

0.00

AEM:

28.15

PS Ratio

EVER:

1.46

AEM:

6.67

PB Ratio

EVER:

5.59

AEM:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

EVER:

$575.76M

AEM:

$8.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EVER:

$554.50M

AEM:

$4.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

EVER:

$42.39M

AEM:

$5.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVER achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 52.01% return.


EVER

YTD

15.31%

1M

-2.91%

6M

20.11%

1Y

-5.20%

3Y*

37.07%

5Y*

-15.63%

10Y*

N/A

AEM

YTD

52.01%

1M

0.69%

6M

40.83%

1Y

76.05%

3Y*

34.23%

5Y*

15.96%

10Y*

15.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EverQuote, Inc.

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EVER vs. AEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVER
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EVER is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EVER is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EVER is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EVER is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EVER is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EVER is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEM is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEM is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEM is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EVER vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EVER Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVER and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EVER vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

EVER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EVER
EverQuote, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.70%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%

Drawdowns

EVER vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVER drawdown since its inception was -91.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVER and AEM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EVER vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 14.37%. This indicates that EVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EVER vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EverQuote, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
166.63M
2.47B
(EVER) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EVER vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EverQuote, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
96.8%
52.0%
(EVER) Gross Margin
(AEM) Gross Margin
EVER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 161.25M and revenue of 166.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.8%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

EVER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.00M and revenue of 166.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

EVER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 7.99M and revenue of 166.63M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.