EVER vs. AEM
EVER (EverQuote, Inc.) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. EVER operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, EVER returned -3.53%/yr vs 20.40%/yr for AEM. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EVER vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVER achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's -13.95% return.
EVER
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 55.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.54%
AEM
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 44.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $362.33M | $376.74M | $426.77M | |
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | $19.36M | $17.40M | $19.21M |
EVER vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | -6.59% | 35.07% | 63.32% | -16.96% | -5.87% | -58.07% | 8.73% | 721.77% | -79.70% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -13.95% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVER and AEM is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between EVER and AEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EVER:
$892.11M
AEM:
$73.56B
EVER:
$2.94
AEM:
$11.60
EVER:
8.59
AEM:
12.52
EVER:
0.04
AEM:
0.19
EVER:
1.32
AEM:
5.06
EVER:
$716.74M
AEM:
$14.43B
EVER:
$698.48M
AEM:
$9.02B
EVER:
$78.59M
AEM:
$10.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVER vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
EVER
AEM
EVER vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVER | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 0.39 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 0.90 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVER vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVER drawdown since its inception was -91.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVER and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVER | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.18% | -90.49% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.80% | -45.80% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.97% | -45.80% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.11% | -45.80% | -32.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.83% | -42.25% | -17.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.41% | -46.63% | -11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.84% | 20.06% | +5.78% |
Volatility
EVER vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) has a higher volatility of 16.42% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 11.20%. This indicates that EVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVER | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.42% | 11.20% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.61% | 36.02% | +29.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.60% | 44.77% | +36.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.02% | 37.35% | +35.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.60% | 37.38% | +38.22% |
Dividends
EVER vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
EVER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.17% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EVER vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EverQuote, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EVER vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
EVER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 186.59M and revenue of 190.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.30B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.
EVER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.42M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.22B and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.0%.
EVER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 42.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EVER and AEM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVER has higher volatility (16.42%) compared to AEM (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVER dropped -91.18% vs AEM's -90.49%.
AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVER and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer