PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAV vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAV vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EVAV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.20%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.91%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAV vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EVAV
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares
0.00%33.87%-50.31%-22.79%-75.60%
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
7.15%21.07%16.50%42.39%-10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAV and QTJL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2022

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between EVAV and QTJL has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EVAV vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAV
QTJL

Consumer Cyclical

22.3%
12.2%

Technology

2.7%
54.2%

Industrials

2.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

15.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAV
22.3%
QTJL
12.2%

Technology

EVAV
2.7%
QTJL
54.2%

Industrials

EVAV
2.6%
QTJL
2.8%

Basic Materials

EVAV

-

QTJL
1.2%

Communication Services

EVAV

-

QTJL
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

EVAV

-

QTJL
7.6%

Energy

EVAV

-

QTJL
0.6%

Financial Services

EVAV

-

QTJL
0.2%

Healthcare

EVAV

-

QTJL
4.2%

Real Estate

EVAV

-

QTJL
0.1%

Utilities

EVAV

-

QTJL
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAV vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAV

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAV vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EVAV vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAVQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

EVAV vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAVQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

EVAV vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAVQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

EVAV vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAV has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVAV vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

EVAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EVAV
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares
0.81%0.97%2.52%2.34%0.51%
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAV and QTJL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EVAV.

EVAV has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EVAV and 0.79% for QTJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAV and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer