PortfoliosLab logo
EVAV vs. CLDL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EVAV and CLDL is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EVAV vs. CLDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EVAV:

0.28

CLDL:

1.08

Sortino Ratio

EVAV:

1.24

CLDL:

1.35

Omega Ratio

EVAV:

1.14

CLDL:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

EVAV:

0.35

CLDL:

0.58

Martin Ratio

EVAV:

1.10

CLDL:

2.38

Ulcer Index

EVAV:

30.74%

CLDL:

18.51%

Daily Std Dev

EVAV:

101.31%

CLDL:

59.58%

Max Drawdown

EVAV:

-95.27%

CLDL:

-82.77%

Current Drawdown

EVAV:

-91.35%

CLDL:

-56.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAV achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than CLDL's 0.77% return.


EVAV

YTD

1.65%

1M

35.09%

6M

2.04%

1Y

28.01%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLDL

YTD

0.77%

1M

14.73%

6M

-11.07%

1Y

63.02%

3Y*

17.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVAV vs. CLDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAV has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CLDL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EVAV vs. CLDL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EVAV is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EVAV is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EVAV is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EVAV is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EVAV is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EVAV is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CLDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLDL is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLDL is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLDL is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLDL is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLDL is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLDL is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EVAV vs. CLDL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EVAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the CLDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAV and CLDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EVAV vs. CLDL - Dividend Comparison

EVAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than CLDL's 0.05% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
EVAV
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares
2.13%2.52%2.34%0.51%0.00%
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%

Drawdowns

EVAV vs. CLDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAV drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than CLDL's maximum drawdown of -82.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAV and CLDL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EVAV vs. CLDL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) has a higher volatility of 26.69% compared to Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) at 10.57%. This indicates that EVAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...