EUV vs. XLK
EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. EUV is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
EUV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EUV
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 26.10%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 45.03%
- 3Y*
- 29.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
EUV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 8.24% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUV and XLK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
EUV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
EUV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -82.05% | +71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.24% | -8.52% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -34.89% | +31.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility
EUV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.11% | 23.50% | +40.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.11% | 25.38% | +38.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.11% | 24.71% | +39.40% |
EUV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUV and XLK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUV.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for EUV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer