EUV vs. XLK
EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. EUV is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
EUV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EUV
- 1D
- -9.72%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -6.66%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 25.39%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- 1Y
- 53.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- 24.71%
EUV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | -0.72% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUV and XLK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
EUV
XLK
EUV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.40 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
EUV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -82.05% | +71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -9.04% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -34.95% | +31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
EUV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.62% | 21.96% | +39.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.62% | 25.07% | +36.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.62% | 24.59% | +37.03% |
EUV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUV and XLK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUV.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for EUV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer