EUV vs. RSPH
EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUV is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while RSPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. EUV is actively managed, while RSPH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.
Performance
EUV vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EUV
- 1D
- 7.00%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RSPH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.82%
EUV vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | -1.44% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUV and RSPH is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUV vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank
EUV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPH
EUV vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUV | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUV vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -24.11%, smaller than the maximum RSPH drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and RSPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUV | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -40.49% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.79% | -2.43% | -16.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -6.12% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility
EUV vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUV | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.82% | 16.33% | +54.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.82% | 16.49% | +54.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.82% | 17.76% | +53.06% |
EUV vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUV vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison
EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.69% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUV and RSPH have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPH.
RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.
EUV is categorized as Technology Equities, while RSPH is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.40% for RSPH.
Find the right allocation for EUV and RSPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer