RSPH vs. IXJ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) and IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC while IXJ tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPH returned 8.73%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for IXJ. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

RSPH vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPH achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPH has outperformed IXJ with an annualized return of 8.73%, while IXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.

RSPH

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 8.20%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 6.05%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 8.73%
• ALL TIME*: 10.98%

IXJ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 7.07%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 8.22%
• ALL TIME*: 7.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	$16.06M	$16.61M	$23.38M
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	$2.33M	$3.63M	$4.82M

RSPH vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	9.56%	9.52%	-0.94%	3.95%	-9.40%	23.19%	18.83%	25.48%	-0.66%	23.70%
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	3.85%	14.99%	0.55%	3.62%	-4.94%	19.60%	12.74%	23.23%	2.83%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPH and IXJ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.87

The correlation between RSPH and IXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPH vs. IXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPH	IXJ
Healthcare	96.6%	99.2%
Technology	1.8%	0.4%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPH vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPH

RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 51

IXJ

IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 61
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPH vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPH	IXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.50	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.38	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.10	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	4.99	+0.97

RSPH vs. IXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPH and IXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPH vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPH drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, roughly equal to the maximum IXJ drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPH and IXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPH	IXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.49%	-40.60%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-10.78%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.13%	-18.14%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-18.14%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.44%	-27.35%	-3.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-2.52%	+1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-6.90%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	4.52%	-0.25%

Volatility

RSPH vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPH	IXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	5.66%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	11.61%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.35%	15.38%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	14.50%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.79%	15.74%	+2.05%

RSPH vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPH and IXJ have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

RSPH vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison

RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than IXJ's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	1.44%	1.40%	1.50%	1.38%	1.17%	1.12%	1.27%	1.42%	2.11%	1.46%	1.73%	2.85%
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	0.67%	0.70%	0.71%	0.66%	0.64%	0.50%	0.51%	0.54%	0.53%	0.47%	0.48%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPH and IXJ in my portfolio?

RSPH and IXJ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPH or IXJ?

RSPH has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to IXJ (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPH dropped -40.49% vs IXJ's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, RSPH or IXJ?

On 10-year performance, RSPH leads with 8.73% vs 8.22% for IXJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPH or IXJ?

Over the 10-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPH or IXJ?

RSPH and IXJ have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPH or IXJ?

IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.67% for RSPH.

What is the main difference between RSPH and IXJ?

RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC, while IXJ tracks S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.