EUSB vs. DBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - EUSB tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index while DBND tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUSB returned 4.27%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for DBND. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUSB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

EUSB vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSB achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.

EUSB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSB vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF	0.13%	7.45%	1.83%	5.80%	-6.20%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.21%	7.41%	3.06%	6.33%	-5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSB and DBND is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022	0.89

The correlation between EUSB and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EUSB vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSB

EUSB Risk / Return Rank: 41
EUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
EUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 39
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSB vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUSB	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.48	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.23	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.72	+0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	5.10	+1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUSB vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSB and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUSB	DBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	1.48	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.48	-0.43

Drawdowns

EUSB vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSB and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUSB	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-9.39%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-2.83%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.76%	-6.25%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.80%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-2.27%	-4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.95%	-0.13%

Volatility

EUSB vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that EUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUSB	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	1.07%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	2.33%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57%	3.30%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.77%	5.09%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.41%	5.09%	+0.32%

EUSB vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUSB vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

EUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF	3.97%	3.84%	3.67%	3.08%	2.21%	1.10%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUSB and DBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, EUSB and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EUSB or DBND?

EUSB has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSB dropped -17.87% vs DBND's -9.39%.

Which ETF is better, EUSB or DBND?

On 3-year performance, DBND leads with 4.50% vs 4.27% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUSB or DBND?

Over the 3-year period, DBND has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUSB or DBND?

EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUSB or DBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.

What is the main difference between EUSB and DBND?

EUSB tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index, while DBND tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUSB and 0.50% for DBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.