EUSA vs. PEXL
EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EUSA tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUSA returned 7.90%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUSA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
EUSA vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 21.98% return.
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
PEXL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 21.98%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 52.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
EUSA vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 10.04% | 10.24% | 14.64% | 17.72% | -17.13% | 25.60% | 15.03% | 30.56% | -12.51% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 21.98% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUSA and PEXL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between EUSA and PEXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EUSA vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUSA
PEXL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
EUSA
PEXL
Industrials
EUSA
PEXL
Financial Services
EUSA
PEXL
-
Healthcare
EUSA
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
EUSA
PEXL
Utilities
EUSA
PEXL
-
Real Estate
EUSA
PEXL
-
Consumer Defensive
EUSA
PEXL
Communication Services
EUSA
PEXL
Energy
EUSA
PEXL
Basic Materials
EUSA
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUSA vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
EUSA
PEXL
EUSA vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUSA | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 4.59 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 19.74 | -9.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUSA | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.95 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
EUSA vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUSA | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -36.76% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -11.43% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -24.72% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -30.44% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -6.72% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.65% | -0.68% |
Volatility
EUSA vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 2.93%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUSA | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 5.31% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 13.14% | -4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 17.79% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 21.86% | -4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 24.04% | -5.70% |
EUSA vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUSA vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than PEXL's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.51% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUSA and PEXL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to EUSA (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.04% vs 7.90% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.37% for PEXL.
EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUSA and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer