PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EUSA vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EUSA vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
-0.88%10.24%14.64%9.04%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
5.52%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 5.52% return.


EUSA

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
10.84%

DARP

1D
1.18%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
5.52%
6M
12.87%
1Y
64.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EUSA vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUSADARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

2.19

-1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.74

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

4.15

-3.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.05

17.03

-12.97

EUSA vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and DARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUSADARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

2.19

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.13

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and DARP is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EUSA vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than DARP's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.68%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.41%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and DARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSADARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-30.27%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-15.92%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-8.02%

+2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.84%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.88%

-1.18%

Volatility

EUSA vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 4.68%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EUSADARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

9.11%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

19.29%

-10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

29.51%

-12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

26.41%

-9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

26.41%

-8.08%