PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUSA vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.68% return.


EUSA

1D
-1.56%
1M
1.24%
YTD
8.32%
6M
8.05%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
11.40%

AVUV

1D
-1.44%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
17.68%
6M
17.05%
1Y
37.41%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
8.32%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%7.84%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.68%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and AVUV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.86

The correlation between EUSA and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUSA vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUSA
AVUV

Technology

21.3%
7.0%

Industrials

14.7%
13.9%

Financial Services

14.4%
25.8%

Healthcare

10.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
18.0%

Utilities

5.6%
0.1%

Real Estate

5.5%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.8%
2.8%

Energy

4.6%
18.2%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.9%

Technology

EUSA
21.3%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

EUSA
14.7%
AVUV
13.9%

Financial Services

EUSA
14.4%
AVUV
25.8%

Healthcare

EUSA
10.1%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EUSA
9.7%
AVUV
18.0%

Utilities

EUSA
5.6%
AVUV
0.1%

Real Estate

EUSA
5.5%
AVUV
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

EUSA
5.2%
AVUV
4.5%

Communication Services

EUSA
4.8%
AVUV
2.8%

Energy

EUSA
4.6%
AVUV
18.2%

Basic Materials

EUSA
4.1%
AVUV
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUSAAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

4.73

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

14.03

-5.12

EUSA vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUSAAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.14

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.56

+0.14

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSAAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-49.42%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-7.95%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-28.79%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-28.79%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.44%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-7.94%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.67%

-0.70%

Volatility

EUSA vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 3.29%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUSAAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.30%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

11.36%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

17.56%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

22.74%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

28.29%

-9.95%

EUSA vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUSA vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than AVUV's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.30%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.53%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUSA and AVUV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to EUSA (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.66% vs 7.56% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.30% for AVUV.

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUSA and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer