EUN.L vs. MMS.L
EUN.L (iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - EUN.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. EUN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EUN.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
EUN.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EUN.L iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS | 5.15% | 20.23% | -2.55% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUN.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EUN.L
MMS.L
Industrials
EUN.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
EUN.L
MMS.L
Technology
EUN.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
EUN.L
MMS.L
Energy
EUN.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
EUN.L
MMS.L
Utilities
EUN.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
EUN.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
EUN.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
EUN.L
-
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUN.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EUN.L
MMS.L
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUN.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUN.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUN.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUN.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | — | — |
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUN.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUN.L iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EUN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for EUN.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer