EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE).
EUN.L and QDVE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. QDVE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both EUN.L and QDVE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUN.L or QDVE.DE.
Key characteristics
| EUN.L | QDVE.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.19% | 39.79% |
| 1Y Return | 9.10% | 48.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.56% | 19.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.28% | 26.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.80 | 2.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.19 | 2.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.05 | 2.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.02 | 9.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.69% | 4.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.15% | 20.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.11% | -31.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.47% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUN.L and QDVE.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 39.79% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while QDVE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUN.L iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS | 2.78% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.27% | 2.39% | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.17% | 3.17% | 2.99% | 2.87% | 2.81% |
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and QDVE.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUN.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) is 4.24%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that EUN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.