PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUN.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUN.L (iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EUN.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L returned 7.22%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.

Performance

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUN.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 7.22%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.

EUN.L

1D
0.84%
1M
0.04%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.47%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
7.22%

ISAC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.84%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.97%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS		5.15%20.23%0.23%9.58%1.57%14.92%-3.44%16.69%-12.04%10.12%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		11.96%13.64%19.87%16.44%-8.43%19.97%12.26%20.98%-4.37%13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN.L and ISAC.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2011

0.73

The correlation between EUN.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EUN.L
ISAC.L

Financial Services

22.8%
17.3%

Industrials

18.1%
9.0%

Healthcare

17.4%
7.8%

Technology

10.0%
33.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.4%

Energy

8.1%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
8.5%

Utilities

4.5%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

1.6%
8.6%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Financial Services

EUN.L
22.8%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Industrials

EUN.L
18.1%
ISAC.L
9.0%

Healthcare

EUN.L
17.4%
ISAC.L
7.8%

Technology

EUN.L
10.0%
ISAC.L
33.9%

Consumer Defensive

EUN.L
9.5%
ISAC.L
4.4%

Energy

EUN.L
8.1%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EUN.L
4.9%
ISAC.L
8.5%

Utilities

EUN.L
4.5%
ISAC.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

EUN.L
3.2%
ISAC.L
2.9%

Communication Services

EUN.L
1.6%
ISAC.L
8.6%

Real Estate

EUN.L

-

ISAC.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with EUN.L:
EUN.L vs. SWDA.LEUN.L vs. VWCE.DEEUN.L vs. QDVE.DEEUN.L vs. VUAA.LEUN.L vs. EUE.LEUN.L vs. XESC.LEUN.L vs. SPY
Often compared with ISAC.L:
ISAC.L vs. VWRA.LISAC.L vs. SSAC.LISAC.L vs. IWDA.LISAC.L vs. VTISAC.L vs. SWDA.LISAC.L vs. VOOISAC.L vs. SWRD.L

Return for Risk

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUN.L
EUN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EUN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EUN.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.30
2.52

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
3.47

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.35

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

16.70

-11.58

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EUN.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.52

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.88

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.86

-0.66

Drawdowns

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and ISAC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUN.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-25.84%

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-6.88%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-18.33%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.31%

-18.33%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.31%

-25.84%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.36%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-3.56%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.80%

+1.41%

Volatility

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that EUN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUN.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.70%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

9.23%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

11.88%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

14.28%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

15.48%

-0.65%

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUN.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS		0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUN.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUN.L.

EUN.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer