PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUN.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUN.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUN.L (iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - EUN.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L returned 7.22%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 7.22%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

EUN.L

1D
0.84%
1M
0.04%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.47%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
7.22%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS		5.15%20.23%0.23%9.58%1.57%14.92%-3.44%16.69%-12.04%10.12%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN.L and CMU.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.84

The correlation between EUN.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EUN.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

22.8%
21.8%

Industrials

18.1%
15.7%

Healthcare

17.4%
4.2%

Technology

10.0%
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
5.2%

Energy

8.1%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
10.1%

Utilities

4.5%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.8%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Financial Services

EUN.L
22.8%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

EUN.L
18.1%
CMU.L
15.7%

Healthcare

EUN.L
17.4%
CMU.L
4.2%

Technology

EUN.L
10.0%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

EUN.L
9.5%
CMU.L
5.2%

Energy

EUN.L
8.1%
CMU.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EUN.L
4.9%
CMU.L
10.1%

Utilities

EUN.L
4.5%
CMU.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

EUN.L
3.2%
CMU.L
2.8%

Communication Services

EUN.L
1.6%
CMU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

EUN.L

-

CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Often compared with EUN.L:
EUN.L vs. SWDA.LEUN.L vs. VWCE.DEEUN.L vs. QDVE.DEEUN.L vs. VUAA.LEUN.L vs. EUE.LEUN.L vs. XESC.LEUN.L vs. SPY
Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. UB06.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 100D.LCMU.L vs. 500U.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.L

Return for Risk

EUN.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUN.L
EUN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EUN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EUN.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.30
1.98

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
2.79

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.58

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

9.67

-4.55

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EUN.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.98

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.66

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.65

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.49

-0.29

Drawdowns

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and CMU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUN.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-32.53%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-11.43%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-11.95%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.31%

-21.11%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.31%

-31.41%

+5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.18%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-5.80%

-4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.05%

+0.16%

Volatility

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) is 4.24%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that EUN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUN.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

5.34%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

12.44%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

14.86%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

16.00%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

16.78%

-1.95%

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUN.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS		0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUN.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUN.L.

EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer