EUM vs. YXI
EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - EUM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%) while YXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUM returned -10.61%/yr vs -7.45%/yr for YXI. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EUM vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.23% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 21.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has underperformed YXI with an annualized return of -10.61%, while YXI has yielded a comparatively higher -7.45% annualized return.
EUM
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -21.23%
- 6M
- -21.58%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- -15.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- -10.61%
YXI
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- -8.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- -7.45%
EUM vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | -21.23% | -22.61% | -0.83% | -3.89% | 21.11% | -1.32% | -24.37% | -15.27% | 14.60% | -28.08% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 21.26% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUM and YXI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EUM and YXI has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUM vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
EUM
YXI
EUM vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.16 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 1.43 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 2.78 | -4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUM vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -81.15% | -12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -12.48% | -20.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -53.12% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.87% | -57.65% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | -64.07% | -3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.89% | -75.24% | -17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -54.38% | -22.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 6.43% | +10.13% |
Volatility
EUM vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 6.92%. This indicates that EUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.91% | 6.92% | +4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 15.69% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 20.17% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 31.49% | -11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 27.43% | -6.72% |
EUM vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUM and YXI have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EUM vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than YXI's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.28% | 3.98% | 4.22% | 3.86% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.35% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUM and YXI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUM has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to YXI (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.19% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 10-year performance, YXI leads with -7.45% vs -10.61% for EUM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YXI has performed better with a -7.45% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUM and YXI have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.35% for YXI.
EUM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%).
YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUM and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer