EUM vs. ORCS
EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and ORCS (Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. EUM is passively managed, while ORCS is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ORCS.
Performance
EUM vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -17.18% return, which is significantly lower than ORCS's 25.50% return.
EUM
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- -17.18%
- 1Y
- -26.52%
- 3Y*
- -13.33%
- 5Y*
- -4.69%
- 10Y*
- -9.20%
ORCS
- 1D
- 6.26%
- 1M
- 37.01%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUM vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | -17.18% | -1.95% |
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 25.50% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUM and ORCS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUM vs. ORCS — Risk / Return Rank
EUM
ORCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EUM vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUM | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUM vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than ORCS's maximum drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and ORCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUM | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -50.25% | -42.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.53% | -10.21% | -82.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.23% | -16.41% | -60.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.60% | — | — |
Volatility
EUM vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUM | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 59.82% | -35.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 59.82% | -39.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 59.82% | -39.07% |
EUM vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUM vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison
EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than ORCS's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.08% | 3.98% | 4.22% | 3.86% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 1.14% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUM and ORCS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ORCS.
EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.14% for ORCS.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EUM and 0.97% for ORCS.
Find the right allocation for EUM and ORCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer