PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUM vs. DFAE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUM vs. DFAE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and DFAE (Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while DFAE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. EUM is passively managed, while DFAE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUM returned -5.09%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for DFAE. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. EUM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFAE.

Performance

EUM vs. DFAE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.40% return, which is significantly lower than DFAE's 25.28% return.

EUM

1D
1.09%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-21.40%
6M
-22.97%
1Y
-32.85%
3Y*
-15.90%
5Y*
-5.09%
10Y*
-10.22%

DFAE

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.78%
YTD
25.28%
6M
27.97%
1Y
49.72%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUM vs. DFAE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets		-21.40%-22.61%-0.83%-3.89%21.11%-1.32%-4.91%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF		25.28%31.48%7.68%12.63%-17.52%3.53%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EUM and DFAE is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

-0.98

The correlation between EUM and DFAE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUM vs. DFAE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EUM
DFAE

Financial Services

47.1%
17.1%

Basic Materials

-

7.7%

Communication Services

-

6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Industrials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

-

34.8%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

EUM
47.1%
DFAE
17.1%

Basic Materials

EUM

-

DFAE
7.7%

Communication Services

EUM

-

DFAE
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EUM

-

DFAE
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

EUM

-

DFAE
3.3%

Energy

EUM

-

DFAE
4.2%

Healthcare

EUM

-

DFAE
3.5%

Industrials

EUM

-

DFAE
10.2%

Real Estate

EUM

-

DFAE
1.5%

Technology

EUM

-

DFAE
34.8%

Utilities

EUM

-

DFAE
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF

Often compared with EUM:
EUM vs. QQQEUM vs. SPYEUM vs. MSFDEUM vs. DOGEUM vs. TQQQEUM vs. CARDEUM vs. MSTZ
Often compared with DFAE:
DFAE vs. DFEMDFAE vs. DFAIDFAE vs. AVEMDFAE vs. VWODFAE vs. DFEMXDFAE vs. VXUSDFAE vs. XSOE

Return for Risk

EUM vs. DFAE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUM
EUM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
EUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUM Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUM vs. DFAE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EUMDFAEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.61
2.63

-4.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-2.42
3.43

-5.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.48

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

3.90

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.91

15.10

-17.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUM vs. DFAE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.61, which is lower than the DFAE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUM and DFAE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EUMDFAEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.61

2.63

-4.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.49

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.50

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.63

-0.99

Drawdowns

EUM vs. DFAE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.07%, which is greater than DFAE's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and DFAE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUMDFAEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.07%

-32.21%

-60.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.25%

-12.80%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.06%

-18.12%

-28.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.02%

-32.19%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.27%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.91%

-2.07%

-90.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.17%

-10.31%

-66.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.41%

3.30%

+14.11%

Volatility

EUM vs. DFAE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) at 8.00%. This indicates that EUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUMDFAEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

8.00%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

16.56%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

19.02%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.81%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

17.84%

+2.70%

EUM vs. DFAE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUM vs. DFAE - Dividend Comparison

EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than DFAE's 1.75% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF		1.75%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%0.00%0.00%
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets		4.54%3.98%4.22%3.86%0.82%0.00%0.15%1.35%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUM and DFAE have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUM has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to DFAE (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.07% vs DFAE's -32.21%.

On 5-year performance, DFAE leads with 8.77% vs -5.09% for EUM. On fees, DFAE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFAE has been the lower-risk option at 8.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAE has performed better with a 8.77% return vs -5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EUM.

EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 1.75% for DFAE.

EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DFAE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EUM and 0.35% for DFAE.

DFAE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUM and DFAE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer