PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUFN vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EUFN has outperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 13.48%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


EUFN

1D
1.20%
1M
3.43%
YTD
4.75%
6M
9.10%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.48%

HSCZ

1D
0.71%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.18%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
4.75%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%26.94%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.99%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and HSCZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.66

The correlation between EUFN and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUFN
HSCZ

Financial Services

97.7%
13.3%

Technology

1.0%
10.8%

Industrials

0.4%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

-

10.8%

Communication Services

-

3.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

9.5%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

EUFN
97.7%
HSCZ
13.3%

Technology

EUFN
1.0%
HSCZ
10.8%

Industrials

EUFN
0.4%
HSCZ
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EUFN
0.2%
HSCZ
10.8%

Basic Materials

EUFN

-

HSCZ
10.8%

Communication Services

EUFN

-

HSCZ
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

EUFN

-

HSCZ
3.9%

Energy

EUFN

-

HSCZ
3.8%

Healthcare

EUFN

-

HSCZ
4.8%

Real Estate

EUFN

-

HSCZ
9.5%

Utilities

EUFN

-

HSCZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUFN vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUFNHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.95

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

12.57

-6.33

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUFNHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-34.89%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-9.61%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-12.81%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.15%

-20.11%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

-34.89%

-18.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.60%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-4.64%

-9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.25%

+1.98%

Volatility

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 4.08%. This indicates that EUFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUFNHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

4.08%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

9.68%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

11.60%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

13.52%

+8.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

15.68%

+8.85%

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUFN vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than HSCZ's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
3.41%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.93%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUFN and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 12.35% for HSCZ. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.93% for HSCZ.

EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while HSCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFN and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer