PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUFN vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUFN vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 23.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EUFN has outperformed FDT with an annualized return of 13.48%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.


EUFN

1D
1.20%
1M
3.43%
YTD
4.75%
6M
9.10%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.48%

FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
4.75%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%26.94%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
23.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and FDT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.77

The correlation between EUFN and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUFN vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUFN
FDT

Financial Services

97.1%
10.2%

Technology

1.0%
8.1%

Industrials

0.4%
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
11.5%

Basic Materials

-

9.6%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

9.2%

Healthcare

-

1.4%

Real Estate

-

5.3%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Financial Services

EUFN
97.1%
FDT
10.2%

Technology

EUFN
1.0%
FDT
8.1%

Industrials

EUFN
0.4%
FDT
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EUFN
0.2%
FDT
11.5%

Basic Materials

EUFN

-

FDT
9.6%

Communication Services

EUFN

-

FDT
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

EUFN

-

FDT
2.8%

Energy

EUFN

-

FDT
9.2%

Healthcare

EUFN

-

FDT
1.4%

Real Estate

EUFN

-

FDT
5.3%

Utilities

EUFN

-

FDT
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUFN vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUFNFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

3.70

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

14.01

-7.78

EUFN vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUFNFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-46.10%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-13.41%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-14.29%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.15%

-32.80%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

-46.10%

-7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-3.37%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-10.76%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

3.54%

+0.69%

Volatility

EUFN vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) is 6.96%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that EUFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUFNFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

8.93%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

17.27%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

19.59%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

18.46%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

18.62%

+5.91%

EUFN vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUFN vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FDT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
3.41%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUFN and FDT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to EUFN (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 11.17% for FDT. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.89% for FDT.

EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFN and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer