PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUAD vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUAD vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUAD achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 10.35% return.


EUAD

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.47%
YTD
-2.37%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCJ

1D
2.01%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.35%
1Y
52.94%
3Y*
47.60%
5Y*
36.72%
10Y*
25.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUAD vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EUAD
Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF
-2.37%74.51%-6.86%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
10.35%78.38%-11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EUAD and CCJ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUAD vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUAD
EUAD Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EUAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUAD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EUAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUAD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUAD vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUADCCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.20

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.83

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

4.43

-4.13

EUAD vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUAD and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUAD vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUAD drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUAD and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUADCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-87.53%

+65.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.04%

-29.13%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.81%

-24.71%

+9.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-46.07%

+40.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

11.99%

-2.65%

Volatility

EUAD vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) is 9.65%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that EUAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUADCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

17.90%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.40%

39.91%

-15.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.15%

55.17%

-26.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

50.01%

-20.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.90%

46.75%

-16.85%

Dividends

EUAD vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

EUAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than CCJ's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
EUAD
Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.41%0.40%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUAD and CCJ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCJ has higher volatility (17.90%) compared to EUAD (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUAD dropped -22.04% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUAD and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer