ETU vs. XRPR
ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) and XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares, while XRPR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the XRP. ETU is actively managed, while XRPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XRPR.
Performance
ETU vs. XRPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -71.52% return, which is significantly lower than XRPR's -42.06% return.
ETU
- 1D
- -6.16%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- 6M
- -63.60%
- YTD
- -71.52%
- 1Y
- -84.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -64.08%
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $268.36K | $336.30K | $484.83K | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
ETU vs. XRPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -71.52% | -64.90% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETU and XRPR is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETU vs. XRPR — Risk / Return Rank
ETU
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETU vs. XRPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETU | XRPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETU vs. XRPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -95.01%, which is greater than XRPR's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and XRPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETU | XRPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.01% | -67.27% | -27.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.07% | -66.38% | -26.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.08% | -45.14% | -19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.86% | — | — |
Volatility
ETU vs. XRPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETU | XRPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 134.09% | 74.44% | +59.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.54% | 74.44% | +69.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.54% | 74.44% | +69.10% |
ETU vs. XRPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETU vs. XRPR - Dividend Comparison
ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETU and XRPR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.
ETU has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while XRPR is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.75% for XRPR.
Find the right allocation for ETU and XRPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer