ETTY vs. BATT
ETTY (Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETTY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETTY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.
Performance
ETTY vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETTY achieves a -43.72% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 14.35% return.
ETTY
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -22.31%
- YTD
- -43.72%
- 6M
- -41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATT
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 80.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- —
ETTY vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -43.72% | -27.75% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 14.35% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTY and BATT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETTY vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
ETTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BATT
ETTY vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (ETTY) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETTY | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETTY vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTY drawdown since its inception was -61.36%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTY and BATT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTY | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.36% | -69.38% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.37% | -12.48% | -46.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -34.60% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.20% | — |
Volatility
ETTY vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETTY | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 32.69% | +31.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.27% | 29.95% | +34.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.27% | 30.76% | +33.51% |
ETTY vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETTY vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
ETTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.18%, more than BATT's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.62% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 36.18% | 6.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETTY and BATT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ETTY.
ETTY has the higher dividend yield at 36.18%, compared with 1.62% for BATT.
ETTY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ETTY and 0.59% for BATT.
Find the right allocation for ETTY and BATT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer