ETRL vs. SPUU
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ETRL is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
ETRL vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.24% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 39.60%
- 3Y*
- 34.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
ETRL vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 1.78% | -51.32% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 13.24% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and SPUU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
ETRL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
ETRL vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETRL | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -59.35% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -6.69% | -43.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -9.48% | -38.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility
ETRL vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 25.05% | +77.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 33.67% | +68.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 35.79% | +66.63% |
ETRL vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
ETRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.39% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and SPUU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for ETRL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer