ETRL vs. CIFG
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
ETRL vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 68.61% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- 12.01%
- YTD
- 68.61%
- 6M
- 38.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 1.78% | -26.94% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 68.61% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and CIFG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -71.71% | -4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -23.17% | -27.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -35.33% | -12.55% |
Volatility
ETRL vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 205.11% | -102.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 205.11% | -102.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 205.11% | -102.69% |
ETRL vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETRL nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and CIFG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
ETRL and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer