PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETO vs. SGMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETO vs. SGMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETO achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than SGMAX's 8.61% return.


ETO

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.64%
YTD
4.31%
6M
9.07%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
12.40%

SGMAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.23%
YTD
8.61%
6M
9.73%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETO vs. SGMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETO
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
4.31%29.96%15.55%21.54%-29.96%37.18%6.25%50.98%-19.19%33.19%
SGMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.61%17.93%15.18%8.86%-3.41%18.94%-2.71%20.58%-4.41%17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ETO and SGMAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.62

The correlation between ETO and SGMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETO vs. SGMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETO
ETO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ETO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ETO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SGMAX
SGMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SGMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SGMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETO vs. SGMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETOSGMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.80

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

11.01

-3.04

ETO vs. SGMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the SGMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETO and SGMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETOSGMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.16

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.75

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Drawdowns

ETO vs. SGMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETO drawdown since its inception was -72.02%, which is greater than SGMAX's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETO and SGMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETOSGMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.02%

-31.27%

-40.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.27%

-5.88%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

-11.57%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-22.11%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.32%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-4.81%

-7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

1.49%

+1.92%

Volatility

ETO vs. SGMAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) at 1.62%. This indicates that ETO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETOSGMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

1.62%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

5.50%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

7.63%

+7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

13.77%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

14.21%

+8.53%

ETO vs. SGMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETO has a 2.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SGMAX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETO vs. SGMAX - Dividend Comparison

ETO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, less than SGMAX's 13.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETO
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
6.77%6.85%7.81%6.97%9.87%5.82%7.36%8.32%11.51%8.50%9.51%9.29%
SGMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.39%14.55%12.63%6.40%11.12%15.38%2.06%4.81%7.86%4.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETO and SGMAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETO has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to SGMAX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETO dropped -72.02% vs SGMAX's -31.27%.

SGMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETO and SGMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer