PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETO vs. EELDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETO vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETO achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ETO has outperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return.


ETO

1D
0.97%
1M
1.90%
6M
5.97%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
12.18%
ALL TIME*
10.59%

EELDX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.31%
6M
5.27%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
7.92%
ALL TIME*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.02M$931.22K$1.13M

ETO vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETO
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
7.11%29.96%15.55%21.54%-29.96%37.18%6.25%50.98%-19.19%33.57%
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
8.57%15.80%14.87%11.46%-6.14%1.55%7.44%18.34%-4.27%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETO and EELDX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETO vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETO
ETO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ETO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ETO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EELDX
EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETO vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETOEELDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.27

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.79

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

19.47

-11.71

ETO vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETO and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETO vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETO drawdown since its inception was -72.02%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETO and EELDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETOEELDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.02%

-19.12%

-52.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.27%

-3.68%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

-3.98%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-17.35%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.03%

-19.12%

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-2.87%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

0.90%

+2.52%

Volatility

ETO vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.66%. This indicates that ETO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETOEELDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

0.66%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

2.99%

+9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

3.48%

+12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

4.61%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

4.71%

+17.98%

ETO vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETO has a 2.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETO vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

ETO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than EELDX's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
10.73%9.44%8.58%9.02%9.17%7.87%7.71%7.86%8.16%7.90%4.12%1.65%
ETO
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
6.66%6.85%7.81%6.97%9.87%5.82%7.36%8.32%11.51%8.50%9.51%9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETO and EELDX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETO has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to EELDX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETO dropped -72.02% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETO and EELDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer