ETNCX vs. EHSTX
ETNCX (Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund) and EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - ETNCX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EHSTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, ETNCX returned 1.86%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for EHSTX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETNCX charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EHSTX.
Performance
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETNCX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than EHSTX's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ETNCX has underperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 1.86%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.
ETNCX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
EHSTX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETNCX Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund | 1.92% | 5.10% | 1.90% | 4.92% | -7.68% | 0.83% | 4.53% | 6.48% | 0.74% | 3.46% |
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 12.75% | 12.11% | 11.25% | 7.93% | -2.80% | 24.25% | 2.29% | 30.84% | -6.96% | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETNCX and EHSTX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1993 | 0.01 |
The correlation between ETNCX and EHSTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETNCX vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank
ETNCX
EHSTX
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (ETNCX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETNCX | EHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.37 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.88 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 11.57 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETNCX drawdown since its inception was -23.81%, smaller than the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETNCX and EHSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETNCX | EHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.81% | -53.47% | +29.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -8.29% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.64% | -16.44% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.24% | -16.44% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.24% | -39.30% | +27.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.05% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -7.40% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 2.06% | -1.23% |
Volatility
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (ETNCX) is 0.80%, while Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that ETNCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETNCX | EHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 4.15% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 8.80% | -6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 11.54% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 14.78% | -10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 17.31% | -13.43% |
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETNCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETNCX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison
ETNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than EHSTX's 5.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 5.37% | 6.12% | 4.03% | 2.93% | 4.25% | 7.32% | 1.94% | 2.76% | 10.94% | 5.88% | 1.33% | 11.02% |
ETNCX Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund | 3.18% | 4.05% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 1.85% | 1.70% | 2.22% | 2.89% | 3.10% | 3.18% | 3.30% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETNCX and EHSTX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EHSTX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to ETNCX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETNCX dropped -23.81% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.
ETNCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETNCX and EHSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer