ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE
ETLS.DE (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLS.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap, while ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETLS.DE returned 25.64% vs 37.69% for ENTR.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETLS.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLS.DE achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than ENTR.DE's 12.78% return.
ETLS.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETLS.DE L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 11.28% | 5.06% | 21.29% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLS.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLS.DE
ENTR.DE
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETLS.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.86 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | 13.56 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETLS.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.27 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLS.DE and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLS.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.98% | -14.17% | -19.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -9.72% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.59% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -5.85% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.77% | -0.64% |
Volatility
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) is 2.76%, while L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that ETLS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLS.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 4.62% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 13.78% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.54% | 16.50% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 15.02% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 15.02% | +2.15% |
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLS.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETLS.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLS.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETLS.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLS.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLS.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ETLS.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. ETLS.DE tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for ETLS.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLS.DE and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer