PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLS.DE vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ETLS.DE is traded in EUR, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLS.DE achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 1.64% return.


ETLS.DE

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.27%
YTD
10.52%
6M
10.85%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*

AMZN

1D
-3.17%
1M
-12.44%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.23%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
20.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLS.DE
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
10.52%5.06%32.53%24.18%-15.96%38.87%10.14%28.47%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
1.64%-7.28%53.92%75.46%-46.49%10.03%61.73%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLS.DE and AMZN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLS.DE
ETLS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ETLS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETLS.DEAMZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.08

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.41

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

0.97

+10.30

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLS.DE and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -60.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLS.DE and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLS.DEAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-60.20%

+26.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-24.04%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-37.68%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-52.70%

+29.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-15.07%

+13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-12.42%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

10.18%

-8.02%

Volatility

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) is 3.44%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that ETLS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLS.DEAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

9.90%

-6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

21.14%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

31.08%

-19.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

35.48%

-19.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

32.82%

-15.59%

Dividends

ETLS.DE vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLS.DE nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLS.DE and AMZN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLS.DE and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer