PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLS.DE
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
-3.51%5.06%32.53%24.21%-16.00%38.89%10.12%27.92%
ETLF.DE
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
22.31%4.67%10.97%-10.24%21.51%40.15%-13.51%4.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLS.DE achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than ETLF.DE's 22.31% return.


ETLS.DE

1D
1.51%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-3.51%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*

ETLF.DE

1D
-1.95%
1M
9.73%
YTD
22.31%
6M
31.92%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLS.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLS.DE
ETLS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ETLS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLF.DE
ETLF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLS.DEETLF.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.24

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

1.70

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.53

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.27

5.34

-1.07

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLS.DE and ETLF.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLS.DEETLF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.24

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.83

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.54

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ETLS.DE and ETLF.DE is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLS.DE nor ETLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, which is greater than ETLF.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLS.DE and ETLF.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLS.DEETLF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-28.78%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-11.91%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-27.00%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-1.95%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-12.31%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

4.17%

-1.78%

Volatility

ETLS.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (ETLS.DE) is 4.07%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that ETLS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETLS.DEETLF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

8.52%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

13.94%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

17.39%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

16.66%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

15.34%

+1.96%