ETIIX vs. NMI
ETIIX (Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund) and NMI (Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX returned 2.00%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for NMI. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ETIIX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NMI.
Performance
ETIIX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETIIX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX has underperformed NMI with an annualized return of 2.00%, while NMI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.60% annualized return.
ETIIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.50%
NMI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 14.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $223.63K | $190.25K | $203.93K |
ETIIX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund | -0.20% | 6.11% | 1.33% | 6.52% | -6.62% | 0.13% | 6.29% | 6.72% | 0.31% | 4.71% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 11.94% | 10.52% | 7.03% | 1.90% | -15.09% | 3.86% | 4.70% | 16.02% | -8.07% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETIIX and NMI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETIIX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank
ETIIX
NMI
ETIIX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETIIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.33 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 6.00 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETIIX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIIX and NMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETIIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.72% | -28.92% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -10.96% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.39% | -11.32% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.72% | -28.92% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.72% | -28.92% | +16.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -2.56% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -5.91% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 2.44% | -1.41% |
Volatility
ETIIX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) is 1.02%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that ETIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETIIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 2.25% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 14.84% | -12.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 15.57% | -12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.19% | 14.71% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 15.04% | -10.96% |
ETIIX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETIIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETIIX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison
ETIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than NMI's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund | 3.20% | 4.26% | 3.91% | 2.41% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.65% | 2.69% | 2.17% | 2.06% | 1.96% | 1.86% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 4.21% | 4.59% | 4.63% | 4.04% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 5.12% | 4.21% | 4.45% | 4.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETIIX and NMI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMI has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to ETIIX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIIX dropped -12.72% vs NMI's -28.92%.
ETIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETIIX and NMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer