ETIIX vs. EELDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ETIIX (Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund) and EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - ETIIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EELDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX returned 2.22%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for EELDX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETIIX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EELDX.

Performance

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETIIX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX has underperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.

ETIIX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 7.04%
• 3Y*: 4.13%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

EELDX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund	1.52%	6.11%	1.33%	6.52%	-6.62%	0.13%	6.29%	6.72%	0.31%	4.71%
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	7.53%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETIIX and EELDX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.03

The correlation between ETIIX and EELDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETIIX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETIIX

ETIIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
ETIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ETIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ETIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ETIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ETIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETIIX	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	5.50	-2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	8.52	-4.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	2.44	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	5.25	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	21.36	-13.88

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETIIX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum EELDX drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIIX and EELDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETIIX	EELDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-19.12%	+6.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-3.68%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.61%	-3.98%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.72%	-17.35%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.72%	-19.12%	+6.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-0.23%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-2.89%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.90%	+0.04%

Volatility

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) is 0.71%, while Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that ETIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETIIX	EELDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	0.76%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.01%	3.06%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	3.51%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.17%	4.62%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	4.73%	-0.65%

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETIIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETIIX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

ETIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than EELDX's 10.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.69%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund	3.41%	4.26%	3.91%	2.41%	2.10%	1.68%	2.65%	2.69%	2.17%	2.06%	1.96%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETIIX and EELDX in my portfolio?

ETIIX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETIIX or EELDX?

EELDX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to ETIIX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIIX dropped -12.72% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.50 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.