ETHW vs. EZET
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHW is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -24.72% vs -24.92% for EZET. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
ETHW vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHW having a -35.73% return and EZET slightly lower at -35.79%.
ETHW
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -17.20%
- YTD
- -35.73%
- 6M
- -35.91%
- 1Y
- -24.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- YTD
- -35.79%
- 6M
- -36.10%
- 1Y
- -24.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -35.73% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -35.79% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and EZET is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ETHW and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
EZET
ETHW vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | -0.37 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | -0.12 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | -0.69 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | -0.37 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | -0.38 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, roughly equal to the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -64.05% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.69% | -61.68% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.59% | -60.64% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -32.61% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.53% | 37.52% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) have volatilities of 9.38% and 9.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 9.27% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.62% | 46.64% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.11% | 68.21% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.08% | 72.32% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.08% | 72.32% | -0.24% |
ETHW vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHW vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHW nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETHW and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHW has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to EZET (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs EZET's -64.05%.
On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -24.72% vs -24.92% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZET has been the lower-risk option at 9.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -24.72% return vs -24.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHW.
ETHW and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.19% for EZET.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer