ETHW vs. CLNK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Bitwise. ETHW is actively managed, while CLNK is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CLNK.

Performance

ETHW vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ETHW

• 1D: -5.78%
• 1M: -23.65%
• YTD: -39.45%
• 6M: -42.65%
• 1Y: -31.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLNK

• 1D: -4.18%
• 1M: -12.86%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHW vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF	-46.89%
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF	-41.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHW and CLNK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

ETHW vs. CLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHW

ETHW Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHW vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHW	CLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHW	CLNK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	-1.14	+0.72

Drawdowns

ETHW vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, which is greater than CLNK's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and CLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHW	CLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.04%	-43.56%	-20.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.87%	-41.92%	-20.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.65%	-32.34%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHW	CLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.33%	67.16%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.13%	67.16%	+4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.13%	67.16%	+4.97%

ETHW vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLNK's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHW vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHW nor CLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHW and CLNK in my portfolio?

ETHW and CLNK have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETHW or CLNK?

On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHW or CLNK?

ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHW or CLNK?

ETHW and CLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETHW and CLNK?

Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.34% for CLNK.