CLNK vs. BITI
CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) and BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - CLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK) spot price while BITI tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. CLNK charges 0.34%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
CLNK vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLNK
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 24.06%
- 6M
- 31.50%
- 1Y
- 45.79%
- 3Y*
- -34.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLNK vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF | -41.92% |
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 38.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLNK and BITI is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | -0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLNK vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
CLNK
BITI
CLNK vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLNK | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.14 | -0.72 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CLNK vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLNK | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -92.16% | +48.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -86.46% | +44.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.34% | -67.95% | +35.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.80% | — |
Volatility
CLNK vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLNK | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.16% | 43.52% | +23.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.16% | 52.50% | +14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.16% | 52.50% | +14.66% |
CLNK vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLNK vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
CLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 9.52% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLNK and BITI have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.52%, compared with 0.00% for CLNK.
CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 1.03% for BITI.
Find the right allocation for CLNK and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer