ETHW vs. BTRN
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHW is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -31.71% vs -18.31% for BTRN. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
ETHW vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.29% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | 4.89% | 24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and BTRN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ETHW and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
BTRN
ETHW vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | -0.93 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | -1.23 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.73 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -1.25 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.93 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.00 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -36.97% | -27.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -25.29% | -37.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -25.29% | -37.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -14.41% | -18.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.74% | 14.68% | +23.06% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 7.24%. This indicates that ETHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 7.24% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 10.35% | +35.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.33% | 19.91% | +48.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 30.96% | +41.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 30.96% | +41.17% |
ETHW vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and BTRN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHW has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to BTRN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -18.31% vs -31.71% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -18.31% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.95% for BTRN.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer