ETHV vs. SMH
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -32.55% vs 150.04% for SMH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
ETHV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.60%
- 1Y
- -32.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 20.06%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 74.08%
- 1Y
- 150.04%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- 38.76%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
ETHV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.25% | 49.17% | -4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and SMH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
SMH
ETHV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.69 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 10.11 | -10.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 38.76 | -39.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 4.94 | -5.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.34 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -84.96% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | -14.93% | -48.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -1.63% | -61.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -41.08% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.95% | 3.89% | +34.06% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 9.71%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 11.58% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | 24.35% | +20.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 30.57% | +37.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 35.01% | +37.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 32.57% | +39.66% |
ETHV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and SMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to ETHV (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -64.02% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 150.04% vs -32.55% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 150.04% return vs -32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SMH is Semiconductors. ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer