PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHV vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHV vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 4.05% return.


ETHV

1D
-1.33%
1M
-25.17%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-43.60%
1Y
-32.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIVR

1D
1.16%
1M
1.60%
YTD
4.05%
6M
29.45%
1Y
114.25%
3Y*
46.03%
5Y*
21.28%
10Y*
15.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHV
VanEck Ethereum ETF
-40.24%-11.02%-3.67%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
4.05%145.34%-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and SIVR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHV vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV
ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHVSIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.36

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

2.71

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

5.80

-6.66

ETHV vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHV Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHV and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHVSIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

1.95

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.32

-0.74

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHVSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.02%

-75.85%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.36%

-42.42%

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.36%

-36.52%

-26.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-47.85%

+15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.95%

19.78%

+18.17%

Volatility

ETHV vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 9.71%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHVSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

16.32%

-6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.31%

58.30%

-12.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.34%

58.84%

+9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.23%

36.17%

+36.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.23%

31.86%

+40.37%

ETHV vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHV vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHV nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHV and SIVR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to ETHV (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -64.02% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 114.25% vs -32.55% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 114.25% return vs -32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

ETHV and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SIVR is Silver. ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.30% for SIVR.

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHV and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer