ETHV vs. SIVR
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -32.55% vs 114.25% for SIVR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
ETHV vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 4.05% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.60%
- 1Y
- -32.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 29.45%
- 1Y
- 114.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
ETHV vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 4.05% | 145.34% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and SIVR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
SIVR
ETHV vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.36 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.71 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 5.80 | -6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.95 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.32 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -75.85% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | -42.42% | -20.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -36.52% | -26.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -47.85% | +15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.95% | 19.78% | +18.17% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 9.71%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 16.32% | -6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | 58.30% | -12.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 58.84% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 36.17% | +36.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 31.86% | +40.37% |
ETHV vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and SIVR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to ETHV (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -64.02% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 114.25% vs -32.55% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 114.25% return vs -32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
ETHV and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SIVR is Silver. ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer