ETHV vs. SIVR
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -36.10% vs 58.85% for SIVR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
ETHV vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -47.61% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's -18.67% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -24.79%
- YTD
- -47.61%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- 1Y
- -36.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- -18.67%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- 1Y
- 58.85%
- 3Y*
- 36.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
ETHV vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -47.61% | -11.02% | -5.50% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.67% | 145.34% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and SIVR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
SIVR
ETHV vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.16 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 2.64 | -3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -75.85% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.88% | -50.92% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.88% | -50.38% | -17.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -47.83% | +13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.85% | 22.34% | +18.51% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 19.83% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 15.49%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.83% | 15.49% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.42% | 59.60% | -13.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.91% | 60.71% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.34% | 36.76% | +35.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.34% | 32.19% | +40.15% |
ETHV vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and SIVR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (19.83%) compared to SIVR (15.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.88% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 58.85% vs -36.10% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 15.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 58.85% return vs -36.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
ETHV and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SIVR is Silver. ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer