ETHV vs. RSBY
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. ETHV is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -37.87% vs 20.17% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
ETHV vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -47.05% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.04% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -11.40%
- 1M
- -32.96%
- YTD
- -47.05%
- 6M
- -48.03%
- 1Y
- -37.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -47.05% | -11.02% | 25.99% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 19.04% | -12.98% | -7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and RSBY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
RSBY
ETHV vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.55 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 5.96 | -6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 1.72 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | -0.19 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.54%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and RSBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.54% | -23.32% | -44.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.54% | -7.95% | -59.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | -6.04% | -61.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -13.76% | -19.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.18% | 3.40% | +34.78% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 14.46% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 1.93%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.46% | 1.93% | +12.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.45% | 8.51% | +37.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.27% | 11.78% | +57.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.63% | 13.53% | +59.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.63% | 13.53% | +59.10% |
ETHV vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and RSBY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to RSBY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.54% vs RSBY's -23.32%.
On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.17% vs -37.87% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.17% return vs -37.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer