ETHV vs. EZPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ).
ETHV and EZPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHV is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. EZPZ is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025. Both ETHV and EZPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -29.44% | 7.79% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -23.94% | -10.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -29.44% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -23.94% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -29.44%
- 6M
- -49.70%
- 1Y
- 14.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 6M
- -43.46%
- 1Y
- -16.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
EZPZ
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | -0.33 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | -0.16 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.33 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | -0.71 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.33 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.59 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and EZPZ is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and EZPZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -52.38% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -52.38% | -9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.75% | -48.71% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.39% | -18.25% | -12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.40% | 24.42% | +5.98% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 14.00%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.28% | 14.00% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.50% | 39.76% | +13.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.80% | 48.54% | +27.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.88% | 49.47% | +25.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.88% | 49.47% | +25.41% |