ETHT vs. EZET
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETHT tracks the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%) while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHT returned -76.37% vs -31.70% for EZET. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
ETHT vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -72.39% return, which is significantly lower than EZET's -39.43% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -11.32%
- 1M
- -43.48%
- YTD
- -72.39%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -76.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.74%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHT vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -72.39% | -64.86% | -29.68% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and EZET is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ETHT and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
EZET
ETHT vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHT | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.51 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -0.84 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHT | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | -0.47 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.41 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than EZET's maximum drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -64.05% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.91% | -62.87% | -29.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | -62.87% | -31.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.82% | -32.67% | -32.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.48% | 37.73% | +24.75% |
Volatility
ETHT vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) at 9.88%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | 9.88% | +10.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.88% | 46.05% | +46.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.57% | 68.43% | +68.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 72.37% | +70.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 72.37% | +70.53% |
ETHT vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 17.20% | 4.57% | 0.02% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETHT and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHT has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to EZET (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -94.34% vs EZET's -64.05%.
On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -31.70% vs -76.37% for ETHT. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZET has been the lower-risk option at 9.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -31.70% return vs -76.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHT.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 17.20%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.
ETHT tracks Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.19% for EZET.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer